Fehlpositionierung der transvenösen Sonde des implantierbaren Cardioverter-Defibrillators im linken Ventrikel über das offene Foramen ovale
Autor: | Herse B, Wieckhorst A, Unterberg C |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2008 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Ejection fraction business.industry medicine.medical_treatment General Medicine Right bundle branch block Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator medicine.disease Amiodarone Coronary artery disease medicine.anatomical_structure Ventricle Internal medicine medicine Cardiology Patent foramen ovale Thoracotomy business medicine.drug |
Zdroj: | DMW - Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift. 123:1172-1176 |
ISSN: | 1439-4413 0012-0472 |
DOI: | 10.1055/s-2007-1024140 |
Popis: | HISTORY AND CLINICAL FINDINGS 24-hour ECG monitoring in a 64-year-old man revealed self-limited ( 200/min. He had triple-vessel coronary artery disease with both anterior and posterior wall infarctions treated by three aortocoronary venous grafts. Physical examination was unremarkable except for a well healed thoracotomy scar. INVESTIGATIONS Programmed ventricular stimulation induced prolonged monomorphic VT of 320 beats/min, despite aminodarone treatment. Left-heart catheterization demonstrated the three patent aortocoronary grafts and a left-ventricular ejection fraction of only 20%. TREATMENT AND COURSE Because of the inducible and prolonged VT, despite antiarrhythmic treatment with amiodarone, a cardioverter-defibrillator was implanted (ICD). During threshold measurements of the pacemaker integrated into the ICD the pacemaker impulse was noted to produce a right bundle branch block pattern, the ICD lead having erroneously been placed in the left ventricle via a patent foramen ovale. The lead was left in place, because the ICD was functioning well and lead removal with the possible need of a thoracotomy carried a high risk. CONCLUSION Extreme caution is needed to avoid malpositioning an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. If the lead tip is unwittingly fixed in the left ventricle but functions well it should be left in place under prophylactic anticoagulation, because of the potentially high risk of its operative removal. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |