What do post-disaster reconstruction project success indicators look like? End-user’s perspectives
| Autor: | Alice Chang-Richards, Tak Wing Yiu, Shawn Hezron Charles |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Construction management
Project success Process management business.industry End user 05 social sciences 0211 other engineering and technologies 02 engineering and technology Building and Construction 021105 building & construction 0502 economics and business Project management Safety Risk Reliability and Quality business 050203 business & management Post disaster |
| Zdroj: | International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment. 13:31-50 |
| ISSN: | 1759-5908 |
| DOI: | 10.1108/ijdrbe-11-2020-0112 |
| Popis: | PurposeThis paper aims to investigate the emergence of new success measures for buildings and infrastructure post-disaster reconstruction projects, beyond the traditional ”iron triangle”, which have gained prominence with the increased involvement of clients and end-users in these projects. Consequently, the industry is obliged to reconsider the critical factors regarding what constitutes a successful outcome from the perspectives of these stakeholders.Design/methodology/approachData was gathered from end-users in four Caribbean islands using a questionnaire survey on eight empirical success indicators obtained from an extensive systematic literature review. To elicit a ranking and correlations amongst the end-user’ perspectives on the indicators, factor analysis and structural equation modelling techniques (SEM) were conducted.FindingsThe factor analysis found “safety” to be the most important empirical success measure, while “change” ranked the least important. Correlation analysis using SEM identified two new composite indicators, namely, “competence” with delivering timely and quality environmentally friendly and sustainable projects and “adaptability” in ensuring project objectives reflect beneficiaries’ expectations amidst internal and external influences, to be critical of end-users’ measurement indicators that describe their assessment mechanism. Measurement and structural models validated “safety” and “satisfaction” to be the highest loading variables in the two composites, respectively.Research limitations/implicationsThe research focussed on findings in English language articles; therefore, any claim to a complete list of indicators from the literature can be amiss.Practical implicationsResults confirm the traditional “iron triangle” of time, cost and quality to be limited in assessing reconstruction project outcomes and the views and expectations of the potential beneficiaries need to be factored in the planning, design, execution and post-handover stages in all reconstruction projects.Originality/valueThis paper was very specific in its attempt to investigate new success indicators for reconstruction project outcomes, aiming to assist with developing comprehensive project objectives that resonate with all stakeholder groups. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|