COMPARISON OF PYRITINOL AND AURANOFIN IN THE TREATMENT OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
| Autor: | E.-M. Lemmel |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 1993 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Intention-to-treat analysis Auranofin Proteinuria business.industry Arthritis medicine.disease Gastroenterology Surgery Rheumatology Tolerability Rheumatoid arthritis Pyritinol Internal medicine medicine Pharmacology (medical) medicine.symptom Adverse effect business medicine.drug |
| Zdroj: | Rheumatology. 32:375-382 |
| ISSN: | 1462-0332 1462-0324 |
| DOI: | 10.1093/rheumatology/32.5.375 |
| Popis: | The efficacy and tolerability of pyritinol (PY) and auranofin (AU) were compared in a multicentre double-blind study. Patients with RA received 600 mg/day PY or 6 mg/day AU for 1 year. Response was rated by a defined improvement in at least four of the following: Ritchie index, joint swelling index, rating scales for pain and general well-being, functional index, morning stiffness, ESR. Of the 139 fully evaluable PY patients 61 (44%) dropped out due to adverse events or response failure compared with 44 (31%) of the 142 AU patients. In patients treated for 1 year efficacy parameters improved more in the PY than in the AU group, with significant differences for the general well-being (P = 0.022), ESR (P = 0.029) and haemoglobin (P = 0.0042). The response rate for PY (61/78 patients, 78%) was significantly superior to AU (58/98 patients, 59% P = 0.009). An intention-to-treat analysis corroborated this result (P = 0.030). Adverse events (AE) occurred in 64% of PY patients and in 58% of AU patients: main AE were mucocutaneous symptoms (PY 36%, AU 23%) and gastrointestinal complaints (PY 30% AU 37%). Single cases of proteinuria, hepatic and haematological abnormalities were noted in both groups. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|