On-farm Study of Human Contact Networks to Document Potential Pathways for Avian Influenza Transmission between Commercial Poultry Farms in Ontario, Canada
| Autor: | M. T. Guerin, Carl S. Ribble, Craig Stephen, T. E. Burns, D.F. Kelton |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2011 |
| Předmět: |
Veterinary medicine
General Veterinary General Immunology and Microbiology business.industry animal diseases Biosecurity Outbreak General Medicine Poultry farming Broiler breeder Biology medicine.disease_cause Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 law.invention Agricultural science Transmission (mechanics) law Agriculture medicine business Ontario canada |
| Zdroj: | Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. 58:510-518 |
| ISSN: | 1865-1674 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/j.1865-1682.2011.01232.x |
| Popis: | Human movements associated with poultry farming create contact networks that might facilitate transmission of avian influenza (AI) between farms during outbreaks. In Canada, no information is available about how these networks connect poultry farms. The purpose of this study was to document human contacts between commercial poultry farms in Ontario, Canada, to learn how AI might be transmitted during outbreaks. We used face-to-face interviews with people entering the farm biosecurity perimeter on four layer, one turkey and three broiler breeder poultry farms in Ontario to collect information on between-farm contacts and biosecurity practices. Over a four-day study period on each farm, a median of 10.5 people entered the farm biosecurity perimeter (range 2-31). Ninety-six per cent (111/118) of people consented to be interviewed. Of these, fifty-three per cent (59/111) had contact with one or more (median 2, degree range 1-14) other poultry farms within 72 h. A median of 25 (range 7-65) human contacts linked study farms to other poultry farms. The mean distance of between-farm contacts was 53 km. Eighty-six per cent of people who answered the biosecurity questions (94/109) reported using one or more biosecurity practices. However, on 7/8 farms, at least one person reported that they did not use any biosecurity practices. Fifty per cent of social visitors used biosecurity, whereas 96% of all other people used biosecurity. Ninety-two per cent of people that entered the poultry barns (46/50) used one or more biosecurity practices, whereas 81% of people (48/59) that did not enter the poultry barns used one or more biosecurity practices. Because our study documented farm visitors who did not use any biosecurity practices and moved between commercial poultry farms, we suggest that rapid trace-out of human movements is as important as containment zoning to limiting disease spread during an outbreak of highly pathogenic AI in Ontario. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|