Insights and Trends in Diabetes Education
| Autor: | Terry Compton, Jane Jeffrie Seley, Judith A. Toth, Carole Mensing, Linda B. Haas, Kristina Ernst, Joseph B. Nelson, Annette Lenzi Martin, Nancy A. Letassy, Karen A. McKnight, Terry Lumber, Janet Regan-Klich |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2008 |
| Předmět: |
Rate of return
Chronic care medicine.medical_specialty Quality management business.industry Endocrinology Diabetes and Metabolism Psychological intervention medicine.disease Health Professions (miscellaneous) Type of service Nursing Diabetes mellitus Family medicine medicine Managed care Revenue business |
| Zdroj: | The Diabetes Educator. 34:970-986 |
| ISSN: | 1554-6063 0145-7217 |
| DOI: | 10.1177/0145721708327286 |
| Popis: | Purpose The purpose of this study is to describe current diabetes education practice and specific interventions and responsibilities of diabetes educators in the United States. Methods The 2008 National Practice Survey (NPS) instrument consisted of 53 items addressing diabetes education program structure, processes and interventions, outcomes and quality improvement activities, and the chronic care model. The survey was hosted online for American Association of Diabetes Educators (AADE) members. Participants totaled 2447 members, constituting a 25% return rate. Data from the 2008 NPS were analyzed and compared with results from previous surveys. Results Nearly two-thirds of respondents in 2008 provided diabetes education in a single location, most commonly in a clinical outpatient/managed care setting (39%). Most programs provided comprehensive services. Managers noted that 42% of their programs were either cost/revenue neutral or profitable. Programs varied in types of services, number of patient visits, team member functions, time spent on services, and instructional methods used. At least 50% of managers said their programs report outcome data, and 88% participate in quality/performance improvement activities. Nearly two-thirds of respondents were unfamiliar with the AADE-adopted chronic care model. Conclusions Many 2008 NPS results concur with those obtained in 2005 through 2007. Areas of variability among programs suggest a need for standardized interventions and prac- tice guidelines. Educators are encouraged to report out- comes to elucidate the contributions of their programs to patient care. AADE can use the results and comparative data obtained from the 2008 survey when developing practice, research, and advocacy activities |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|