Computed tomography-guided cutting needle biopsy for lung nodules
Autor: | Yu-Fei Fu, Xiao Zhang, Hua-Long Wang, Xiao-Bing Huo, Hui-Mei Zhang |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Lung
medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Nodule (medicine) Computed tomography Retrospective cohort study General Medicine medicine.disease Effective dose (radiation) 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine medicine.anatomical_structure Pneumothorax 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Biopsy Cutting needle medicine 030212 general & internal medicine medicine.symptom business Nuclear medicine |
Zdroj: | Medicine. 100:e24001 |
ISSN: | 1536-5964 0025-7974 |
DOI: | 10.1097/md.0000000000024001 |
Popis: | We aim to compare the diagnostic accuracy, safety, and radiation exposure between low-dose and standard-dose computed tomography (CT)-guided cutting needle biopsy (CNB) for lung nodules.From January 2016 to August 2017, all consecutive patients admitted with lung nodule underwent low-dose or standard-dose CT-guided CNB procedure in our center. Diagnostic accuracy and radiation dose were compared.A total of 67 and 69 patients who underwent low-dose and standard-dose CT-guided CNB procedure were included in this study. Each patient underwent CT-guided CNB for 1 nodule. The technical success rates were 100% in both groups. The sensitivity, specificity, and overall diagnostic accuracy were 97.7%, 100%, and 98.5% for low-dose group and 91.5%, 100%, and 94.2% for standard-dose group. There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy (P = .380) between 2 groups. Pneumothorax was found in 8 and 15 patients in the low-dose and standard-dose groups, respectively (11.9% vs 21.7%, P = .127). Hemoptysis was found in 10 and 10 patients in the low-dose and standard-dose groups, respectively (14.9% vs 14.5%, P = .943). The mean dose-length product was 38.2 ± 17.2 mGy-cm and 375.3 ± 115.7 mGy-cm in the low-dose and standard-dose groups (P |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |