| Popis: |
1. When the current available data in the literature is summarized it becomes evident that the majority of it supports the position that it is, at least for medical reasons, not advisable to exclude patients over the age of 80 years from chronic dialysis. 2. It is correct to say that the refusal of dialysis therapy for elderly dialysis patients would lead to a not insignificant cutting of costs, although elderly patients are not as 'expensive' as younger dialysis patients. 3. The decision to exclude patients over 80 from dialysis treatment is difficult, in our opinion, to support ethically. 4. The refusal of therapy by a dialysis patient--independent of his age--can only occur with his/her consent, as long as the patient is clearly conscious of the decision. 5. Should the patient no longer be in the condition to exercise his/her autonomy, and there is no AD, the Surrogate's Court must be consulted. 6. AD can be seen as helpful, since they not only make the decisions for physicians easier, but also because they can be seen as an act of care for family members. 7. Whenever dialysis therapy is discontinued the problematic nature of so-called essential care should be carefully considered, especially if no clear position has been taken in an AD. |
Full text from SpringerLink