Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) andT2mapping at 3T MRI of the wrist: Feasibility and clinical application
| Autor: | Iris Burkholder, Falko von Stillfried, Bastian Klaan, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Christoph Rehnitz, Marc-André Weber |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2016 |
| Předmět: |
030203 arthritis & rheumatology
medicine.medical_specialty medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry T2 mapping Gadolinium Cartilage chemistry.chemical_element Magnetic resonance imaging Wrist pain Wrist Chondromalacia 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging 03 medical and health sciences Biochemical imaging 0302 clinical medicine medicine.anatomical_structure chemistry medicine Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Radiology medicine.symptom business |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 45:381-389 |
| ISSN: | 1053-1807 |
| Popis: | Purpose To assess the feasibility of delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of cartilage (dGEMRIC) and T2 mapping for biochemical imaging of the wrist at 3T. Materials and Methods Seventeen patients with wrist pain (mean age, 41.4 ± 13.1 years) including a subgroup with chondromalacia (n = 11) and 15 healthy volunteers (26.0 ± 2.2 years) underwent dGEMRIC and T2 mapping at 3T. For dGEMRIC, the optimum time window after contrast-injection (gadopentetate dimeglumine) was defined as the plateau of the T1 curve of repeated measurements 15–90 minutes postinjection and assessed in all volunteers. Reference values of healthy-appearing cartilage from all individuals and values in areas of chondromalacia were assessed using region-of-interest analyses. Receiver-operating-characteristic analyses were applied to assess discriminatory ability between damaged and normal cartilage. Results The optimum time window was 45–90 minutes, and the 60-minute timepoint was subsequently used. In chondromalacia, dGEMRIC values were lower (551 ± 84 msec, P < 0.001), and T2 values higher (63.9 ± 17.7, P = 0.001) compared to healthy-appearing cartilage of the same patient. Areas under the curve did not significantly differ between dGEMRIC (0.91) and T2 mapping (0.99; P = 0.17). In healthy-appearing cartilage of volunteers and patients, mean dGEMRIC values were 731.3 ± 47.1 msec and 674.6 ± 72.1 msec (P = 0.01), and mean T2 values were 36.5 ± 5 msec and 41.1 ± 3.2 msec (P = 0.009), respectively. Conclusion At 3T, dGEMRIC and T2 mapping are feasible for biochemical cartilage imaging of the wrist. Both techniques allow separation and biochemical assessment of thin opposing cartilage surfaces and can distinguish between healthy and damaged cartilage. Level of Evidence: 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;45:381–389. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text