| Autor: |
Jiajun Huang, Junshen Huang, Xiangge Liu, Song-jie Yang, Shixin Lu, Yuwei Liang, Lin Huang, Ziying Cheng, Xu-biao Chen, Yuxi Li |
| Rok vydání: |
2020 |
| Předmět: |
|
| DOI: |
10.21203/rs.3.rs-129857/v1 |
| Popis: |
Introduction Upper lumbar burst fractures (L1or L2) are often followed by bilateral pedicle screw fixation at the level of fracture using posterior short-segment pedicle instrumentation. However, it can aggravate the trauma to the fractured vertebra. We have introduced a modified technique of posterior short-segment instrumentation for the treatment of upper lumbar burst fracture. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiologic results of modified technique versus conventional technique using posterior short-segment pedicle instrumentation in the treatment of upper lumbar burst fractures. Methods The data from 64 patients with upper lumbar burst fracture who had undergone posterior short-segment instrumentation from April 2014 to November 2018 in our clinic were evaluated in the present retrospective study. All the patients were divided into 2 groups according to the surgical technique, including 27 patients (modified order of intraoperative pedicle screw placement) in modified group and 37 patients (conventional order of intraoperative pedicle screw placement) in conventional group. The clinical outcomes and radiological parameters were evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively, at 3-month follow-up and final follow-up.Results Technical success was achieved in all 64 patients. The operation time of modified group(130.4±32.4min) is significantly longer than conventional group (115.3±26.8min, pppppConclusions Modified technique and conventional technique of posterior short-segment pedicle screw fixation for upper lumbar burst fractures both provided immediate stability and reduction of post-traumatic segmental kyphosis. In addition, modified technique of posterior short-segment pedicle screw fixation seems to be a promising method for upper lumbar burst fractures because it led to better reduction of fractured vertebra than in patients who received conventional technique. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
