Living Under the Bell Jar: Surveillance and Resistance in Yevgeny Zamyatin's We
| Autor: | Michael D. Amey |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2005 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Critical Survey. 17 |
| ISSN: | 1752-2293 0011-1570 |
| DOI: | 10.3167/001115705781002057 |
| Popis: | Observation plays an increasingly significant role in twentiethcentury society as a means of regulation. In this regulatory function, observation manifests itself in the ubiquitous CCTV, traffic cameras and other surveillance techniques used to monitor and record the activities of ordinary citizens. One of the more alarming recent manifestations of the potential for all-pervasive surveillance is the announcement of the development of an urban surveillance system by the United States military, which 'would use computers and thousands of cameras to track, record and analyze the movement of every vehicle in a foreign city,' and which could potentially be used by governments on their own citizens.1 The dramatic increase of surveillance in the twentieth-century has also been matched by an increase of voyeuristic entertainment, exemplified by the Orwellian titled television game show Big Brother. The entertainment value of voyeuristic surveillance has arguably rendered individuals more accepting of regulatory surveillance in their personal lives. This trend towards increasing surveillance coupled with a citizenry inured to a constant invasion of its privacy has formed the basis for a number of twentieth-century dystopian novels and films, such as George Orwell's 1984 (1949), George Lucas's THX-1138 (1971), Stephen King's The Running Man (1982), Peter Weir's The Truman Show (1998), Kurt Wimmer 's Equilibrium (2002) and the Warchowski brothers' Matrix trilogy (1999-2003). The widely acknowledged forerunner of these works, however, was a novel, We, written in 1921 by the Russian author, Yevgeny Zamyatin.2 Zamyatin's concerns about the power of vision in regulating society and individuals have been shared by twentieth-century cultural theorists such as Michel Foucault and Laura Mulvey. Paradoxically, while Zamyatin's novel suggests that surveillance in the hands of the state is a mechanism for regulating, and perhaps even for destroying © CS 2005 |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|