The Combined Use of Gene Expression Profile and Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA Testing in the Management of Heart Transplant Patients: The Mid America Experience

Autor: Andrew Kao, D. Vodnala, Anthony Magalski, A.M. Borkon, Michael E. Nassif, Bethany A. Austin, Taiyeb M. Khumri, Timothy J. Fendler, Brett W. Sperry, Mark P. Everley, J. Linard, S.L. Lawhorn
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
Zdroj: The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 39:S253-S254
ISSN: 1053-2498
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2020.01.549
Popis: Purpose Gene expression profile (GEP) testing has a high negative predictive value for Methods dd-cfDNA was drawn beginning at 2 mos post transplant and GEP was drawn at 2 mos or 30 days post prednisone wean Results Between 2/11-10/4/19, 121 pts (54.8±12.9 yrs; 79% men) between 2 mos-3 yrs post transplant had 324 visits with both GEP/dd-cfDNA. Table shows distribution of results. Only 6% were above threshold for both. This led to an additional 12 (60%) EMBs. 20% had positive GEP with negative dd-cfDNA (which would have led to an EMB without dd-cfDNA), EMB was cancelled for 46 (70%) of these visits. 8% of visits had only dd-cfDNA elevation. 13 (52%) of these had EMBs, but 10 (40%) EMBs were cancelled in favor of repeating dd-cfDNA at the next visit. 66% had both tests negative and EMB was cancelled for 156 (73%) of these visits. With the use of dd-cfDNA, an additional 13 EMBs were performed with negative GEP but 46 EMBs were avoided due to dd-cfDNA being negative with a positive GEP. For visits starting at 6 mos, 84% of EMBs were cancelled due to combined testing. Without dd-cfDNA, only 73% EMBs would have been cancelled for negative GEP. Conclusion Adding dd-cfDNA to GEP testing helped reclassify some GEP positive only pts into a lower risk group with an additional 11% of EMBs cancelled. Further evaluation of the utility of the combined use of GEP and dd-cfDNA is warranted.
Databáze: OpenAIRE