Structured intercomparison of nuclear medicine physicians’ education and training programs in 12 EANM member-affiliated member countries
| Autor: | I. Armeniakos, S.N. Chatziioannou, N. Soneji, A. Prigent, J. Koutsikos, N. Arslan, Paul Roach, S. Bakalis, K.P. Smidt, X. Geronikola-Trapali, G. Farmakis, A.P. Stefanoyiannis |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2014 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Radiological and Ultrasound Technology Standardization business.industry education Biophysics Specialty Successful completion Training (civil) National education Continuing professional development Family medicine medicine Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Duration (project management) business Nuclear medicine Accreditation |
| Zdroj: | Médecine Nucléaire. 38:456-468 |
| ISSN: | 0928-1258 |
| Popis: | Introduction The nuclear medicine physician is a member of a team responsible for the safe and correct implementation of radioactivity-based procedures. To ensure the consistent provision of high-quality services, sufficient education and training are necessary. The aim of this study was to provide a structured description of the present status of the education and training framework in 12 EANM member or affiliated member countries. Materials and methods The acquisition of data describing national education and training systems was based on a questionnaire prepared by the authors. It comprised 19 questions related to education and training, the different professional levels, the presence or not of a national register and its characteristics, and finally of other miscellaneous professional issues. Results In the majority of cases, being an accredited nuclear medicine physician is required to practice nuclear medicine. The specialty duration ranges from 4 to 6 years (or 5 to 7 years for dual accreditation). Successful completion of the specialty requires satisfaction of time-related as well as other threshold criteria. A national register is available in the majority of the countries. There can be a register renewal mechanism, based on a Continuing Professional Development system. Discussion In conclusion, a common policy is generally followed in the countries evaluated, notwithstanding the presence of a few noted differences. Certain suggestions have been made, including the proposed threshold criteria for successful specialty completion, standardization of radiology-related training, the adoption of Continuing Professional Development systems and national registers’ renewal mechanisms. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect