OUP accepted manuscript
| Autor: | Paul Johnson, Silvia Falcetta |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
021110 strategic
defence & security studies Sociology and Political Science Parliament media_common.quotation_subject 05 social sciences 0211 other engineering and technologies Legislation 02 engineering and technology 16. Peace & justice humanities 0506 political science Promotion (rank) 5. Gender equality Political science Law parasitic diseases 050602 political science & public administration Hansard Constitutional court Homosexuality health care economics and organizations media_common |
| Zdroj: | Parliamentary Affairs. |
| ISSN: | 1460-2482 0031-2290 |
| DOI: | 10.1093/pa/gsz025 |
| Popis: | In 2014, the Constitutional Court of Uganda nullified the Anti-Homosexuality Act 2014. Since that time, homosexuality has remained a key issue of debate in the Ugandan Parliament and there have been consistent calls from parliamentarians for the enactment of new anti-gay law. In this article, which is based on an analysis of the Official Report (Hansard), we provide a critical consideration of activity in the Ugandan Parliament relating to the issue of homosexuality since 2014. We examine how parliamentarians conceptualize the ‘problem’ of homosexuality and the claims they make about homosexuals. We show that calls for the increased regulation of homosexuality largely depend on problematic assertions about two related issues: the so-called ‘promotion’ of homosexuality in Uganda, and the imagined ‘recruitment’ of Ugandan children into homosexuality. We conclude by arguing that if the current level of support in the Parliament for anti-gay legislation is to be diminished, and the enactment of new anti-gay law is to be avoided, then it is crucial that some Ugandan parliamentarians speak out against homophobia and, importantly, are given support to do so. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|