| Popis: |
Two approaches to grammaticalization have emerged over the years, namely functionalist and generativist, and usually a given grammaticalization study usually reflects only one of these points of view. In this paper the development of two English prepositional subordinators of purpose is looked into using both perspectives, first functionalist then minimalist, resulting in a more variegated interpretation of the data. A subsequent juxtaposition of the two concepts of grammaticalization reveals that they complement each other to a large extent, the primary area of overlap being the notions of cyclicity and reanalysis. While the two concepts differ in, for example, the answer to the crucial question why grammaticalization takes place, a proposal is made that each model has potential for accommodating the insights from the other. |
Full Text from ScienceDirect