June–September 2021
| Autor: | Frank Cranmer |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2022 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Ecclesiastical Law Journal. 24:96-100 |
| ISSN: | 1751-8539 0956-618X |
| DOI: | 10.1017/s0956618x21000697 |
| Popis: | Though public policy continued to be dominated by the COVID-19 pandemic, restrictions began to ease as the vaccine rollout progressed. The volume of secondary legislation barely slackened, however, and the lack of parliamentary scrutiny was a cause of concern both to academic commentators and to parliamentarians. On 10 June, the House of Lords Constitution Committee published its third and final report on the constitutional implications of coronavirus and was clearly very unhappy with the course of events: ‘The Government has introduced a large volume of new legislation, much of it transforming everyday life and introducing unprecedented restrictions on ordinary activities. Yet parliamentary oversight of these significant policy decisions has been extremely limited.’ |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|