5-YEAR OUTCOME OF PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION VS. CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY FOR PATIENTS PRESENTING WITH UNPROTECTED LEFT MAIN CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE: A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AND PROPENSITY SCORE ADJUSTED STUDIES

Autor:	Pattara Rattanawong, Wasawat Vutthikraivit, Rasikh Ajmal, Barbara Mantilla, Saranapoom Klomjit, M Rubayat Rahman, Prapaipan Putthapiban, Jakrin Kewcharoen, Narut Prasitlumkum
Rok vydání:	2020
Předmět:	medicine.medical_specialty business.industry medicine.medical_treatment Percutaneous coronary intervention Stent law.invention Coronary artery bypass surgery surgical procedures operative medicine.anatomical_structure Pharmacotherapy Randomized controlled trial law Internal medicine Conventional PCI Propensity score matching Cardiology Medicine cardiovascular diseases Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business Artery
Zdroj:	Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 75:1536
ISSN:	0735-1097
DOI:	10.1016/s0735-1097(20)32163-x
Popis:	With the advance in stent, imaging and pharmacotherapy in the past decade, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been accepted as a treatment in selected patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCAD). However, the long-term outcomes of PCI vs coronary artery bypass
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::2048959c426a28bddb2e0fdb64ea408b https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(20)32163-x Zobrazit plný text záznamu