Popis: |
The problems of public management in the post-totalitarian society are highlighted in this paper. According to the available publications, specific examples of miscalculations in the state development are given. Their inheritance and logical-consequential connection with the efficiency of state management by society development are determined. The analysis of our state management by each president of Ukraine in the context of positive and negative achievements is carried out. Their causal relationship from the beginning of independence to the present is analyzed. The nature of miscalculations is considered. The problem of low responsibility or its absence for the majority of Ukrainian leaders, politicians and public figures is described. The principles being projected on any branch of national economy making it possible to strengthen responsibility and thus to provide relative management efficiency are offered. Some impact factors contributing to the effective work of managers are considered. Thesis about the lack of responsibility according to the results of management resulting in managers abuse at different levels and different forms of ownership and the need to ensure it is substantiated. It is recommended to support the concept of responsibility by forming «corporate ethics» code from enterprise manager to public management leaders. Moral crisis of the leaders, especially in public sector, which is the primary source of corruption is emphasized, as the main morality ideologist for the leader should be education, responsibility, spirituality, patriotism and professionalism, etc. Special attention is paid to the need for managers to implement the «corporate culture» and oneself formation as the state leader in order to improve management efficiency. It is defined that the properties characterizing successful leader and which are possessed by every leader will make it possible to create favorable climate for their employees and in the country. It is proposed to develop the moral code for the first leaders of the state, as behavior rules, which should be collected in the organization charter or behavior code for manager, employee, entrepreneur, owner and others. |