Comparison of Hemodynamic Changes after Intubation with Macintosh and McCoy Laryngoscopes–A Randomised Controlled Trial
Autor: | Sarah Nisar, Mashooque Ali, Tariq Mehmood, Fawad Alam, Salma Nisar, Muhammad Awais Qarni |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2023 |
Předmět: | |
Zdroj: | Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal. 73:460-63 |
ISSN: | 2411-8842 0030-9648 |
DOI: | 10.51253/pafmj.v73i2.7749 |
Popis: | Objective: To compare hemodynamic changes (systolic blood pressure and pulse) after intubation with Macintosh and McCoy laryngoscopes. Study Design: Randomised control trial (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05133375) Place and Duration of Study: Combined Military Hospital, Jhelum Pakistan, from Apr to Oct 2021. Methodology: A group of 272 patients reporting to the operation theatre were selected and divided into Group-A and B using the lottery method. All patients had ASA class I and II score and Mallampati score of I and II with no comorbid conditions. Macintosh laryngoscope was used in Group-A, and McCoy laryngoscope was used in Group-B. Before intubation, systolic blood pressure and pulse were measured, as well as 30 seconds, 2 minutes, and 3 minutes following intubation. In addition, a comparison of both groups regarding systolic blood pressure and pulse was made. Results: The patients in the study had a mean age of 34.93±9.66 years. The increase (20%) in heart rate was significantly higher in the Macintosh-Group 23(16.9%), than in the McCoy-Group 8(4.4%), (p=0.001), and the 20% increase in systolic pressure was also found to be significantly higher in the Macintosh-Group as compared to the McCoy-Group, 26(19.1%) versus 8(6.6%), (p=0.002). Conclusion: According to our research, using the McCoy blade is a safer mode of intubation in terms of the hemodynamic response. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |