Measurement issues associated with conditional reasoning tests: An examination of faking

Autor:	Mark C. Bowler, John G. Cope, Jennifer L. Bowler
Rok vydání:	2013
Předmět:	Response distortion Addiction media_common.quotation_subject Personality Context (language use) Conditional reasoning Construct (philosophy) Psychology Social psychology General Psychology Cognitive bias media_common Test (assessment)
Zdroj:	Personality and Individual Differences. 55:459-464
ISSN:	0191-8869
DOI:	10.1016/j.paid.2013.04.011
Popis:	Conditional reasoning (CR) is a new item format that measures personality by indirectly assessing reliance upon the cognitive biases associated with specific traits ( James et al., 2005 ). Previous research suggests that, relative to self-report measures, responses on CR-based measures are more difficult to distort ( LeBreton, Barksdale, Robin, & James, 2007 ). The issue of response distortion in the context of CR-based measures was evaluated in two studies. Study 1 (within-subjects) and Study 2 (between-subjects) both investigated whether responses on a CR-based test of addiction could be faked when indirect assessment was upheld. Results of both studies indicated that, unlike a self-report measure of a similar construct, the CR-based measure was unaffected by response distortion.
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::1d735bb0759f6c54b8c367b87afa0dfc https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.04.011 Zobrazit plný text záznamu Full Text from ScienceDirect