Bedrock or social construction? What Anthropocene science means for political theory
| Autor: | Manuel Arias-Maldonado |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Global and Planetary Change
geography geography.geographical_feature_category 010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences Ecology Bedrock Geology Environmental ethics 010501 environmental sciences Social constructionism 01 natural sciences Politics Scientism Anthropocene Political philosophy 0105 earth and related environmental sciences |
| Zdroj: | The Anthropocene Review. 7:97-112 |
| ISSN: | 2053-020X 2053-0196 |
| DOI: | 10.1177/2053019619899536 |
| Popis: | How should political thinkers deal with environmental science? The question has acquired a new urgency with the rise of the Anthropocene, a scientific concept rapidly assimilated by the social sciences and the humanities. In that respect, some critics have levelled against it the well-known objections that environmental political thinkers and philosophers have directed towards science at large in the past. Anthropocene science might lead towards planetary governmentality, imposing a reductive way of understanding both the planet and sustainability. This article will claim that a clear demarcation between scientific and sociopolitical enquiries is needed. Political thinkers should take the findings provided by natural scientists as the basis for normative exploration and the quest for meaning. Arendt’s reflections on truth and factfulness will help to make this point. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|