Evaluation of Two New Scales Assessing Driving Anger: The Driving Anger Expression Inventory and the Driver's Angry Thoughts Questionnaire
| Autor: | Jerry L. Deffenbacher, Gail S. White, Rebekah S. Lynch |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2004 |
| Předmět: |
media_common.quotation_subject
Discriminant validity Anger Explained variation behavioral disciplines and activities Clinical Psychology Expression (architecture) mental disorders Anger expression behavior and behavior mechanisms Trait Psychology Incremental validity psychological phenomena and processes media_common Clinical psychology |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 26:87-99 |
| ISSN: | 0882-2689 |
| DOI: | 10.1023/b:joba.0000013656.68429.69 |
| Popis: | This study assessed the validity of the Driving Anger Expression Inventory (DAX) and Driver's Angry Thoughts Questionnaire (DATQ). Scales within the DAX and DATQ appeared to assess separate, correlated constructs. Aggressive forms of thinking and anger expression correlated positively with each other, trait driving anger, aggressive and risky behavior, some crash-related conditions, general trait anger, and general forms of anger expression. Positive, constructive forms of thinking and anger expression correlated positively with each other, but minimally or negatively with other variables. Specific aggressive forms of thinking and anger expression formed stronger links with each other than other forms of expression, supporting the discriminant validity of the DATQ and DAX. Hierarchical regressions with DATQ and DAX scales entered after other variables showed that they added explained variance above and beyond other measures, supporting the discriminant and incremental validity of these scales. It was concluded that the DAX and DATQ have utility for researchers and clinicians interested in angry drivers. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink