283 Salvage Versus Primary Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity-Matched Comparative Effectiveness Study from A High-Volume Tertiary Centre
| Autor: | A Arora, Senthil Nathan, S Patel, Greg Shaw, M Fricker, K Flora, Veeru Kasivisvanathan, Prabhakar Rajan, R. De Groote, Prasanna Sooriakumaran, Ashwin Sridhar, John D. Kelly, Y Phuah, Tim Briggs, A Nathan |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | British Journal of Surgery. 108 |
| ISSN: | 1365-2168 0007-1323 |
| Popis: | Aim Salvage Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (sRARP) is a potential treatment option for locally recurrent Prostate Cancer after non-surgical primary treatment. There are minimal data comparing outcomes between propensity-matched salvage and primary Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP). We compare perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes of sRARP with primary RARP and between sRARP post-whole and focal gland therapy. Method 1:1 propensity-matched comparison of 146 sRARP with primary RARP from a cohort of 3,852 consecutive patients from a high-volume tertiary centre. Results There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between the salvage and primary RARP groups. Grade III-V Clavien-Dindo complication rates were 1.3% and 0% in the salvage and primary groups, respectively (p = 0.310). Median (IQR) follow-up was 16 (10,30) and 21 (13,33) months in the salvage and primary groups, respectively. BCR rates were 30.8% and 13.7% in the salvage and primary groups, respectively (p Conclusions SRARP has similar perioperative but inferior oncological outcomes to primary RARP. Continence rates are similar to primary RARP, but potency is worse. Perioperative and oncological outcomes of sRARP after focal gland therapy are similar but continence outcomes are superior compared to sRARP after whole gland therapy. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|