A Comparison of Sampling Mechanisms Available for Small-Diameter Ground Water Monitoring Wells
| Autor: | David M. Nielsen, Gillian L. Yeates |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 1985 |
| Předmět: |
Engineering
geography Piston pump geography.geographical_feature_category business.industry Sample (material) Sampling (statistics) Aquifer Monitoring program Software portability Reliability (semiconductor) business Process engineering Simulation Water Science and Technology Civil and Structural Engineering Water well |
| Zdroj: | Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation. 5:83-99 |
| ISSN: | 1069-3629 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/j.1745-6592.1985.tb00927.x |
| Popis: | The objective of most ground water quality monitoring programs is to obtain samples that are “representative” or that retain the physical and chemical properties of the ground water in an aquifer. Many factors can influence whether or not a particular sample is representative, but perhaps the most critical factor is the method or type of sampling device used to retrieve the sample. The sampling equipment available today ranges from simple to highly sophisticated, and includes bailers, syringe devices, suction-lift pumps, gas-drive devices, bladder (Middelburg-type) pumps, gear-drive and helical rotor electric submersible pumps and gas-driven piston pumps. New devices are continually being developed for use in small-diameter wells in order to meet the needs of professionals engaged in implementing elaborate ground water monitoring programs. In selecting a sampling device for a monitoring program, the professional must consider a number of details. Among the considerations are: the outside diameter of the device, the overall impact of the device on ground water sample integrity (including the materials from which the sampling device and associated equipment are made and the method by which the device delivers the sample), the capability of the device to purge the well of stagnant water, the rate and the ability to control the rate at which the sample is delivered, the depth limitations of the device, the ease of operating, cleaning and maintaining the device, the portability of the device and required accessory equipment, the reliability and durability of the device, and the initial and operational cost of the device and accessory equipment. Based on these considerations, each of the devices available for sampling ground water from small-diameter wells has its own unique set of advantages and disadvantages that make it suitable for sampling under specific sets of conditions. No one sampling device is applicable to all sampling situations. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|