Solidarity as a Theoretical Framework for Posthumous Assisted Reproduction and the Case of Bereaved Parents
Autor: | Roy Gilbar, Efrat Ram-Tiktin |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
media_common.quotation_subject
Reproduction (economics) 05 social sciences 06 humanities and the arts 0603 philosophy ethics and religion Solidarity 0506 political science Liberalism (international relations) Philosophy Individualism Philosophy of medicine Spouse 060302 philosophy 050602 political science & public administration Political philosophy Psychology Social psychology Social Sciences (miscellaneous) Autonomy media_common |
Zdroj: | Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 22:501-517 |
ISSN: | 1572-8447 1386-2820 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10677-019-10012-y |
Popis: | Bioethicists, medical professionals and lawyers who support Posthumous Assisted Reproduction (PAR) as an ethical procedure in the case of the deceased’s spouse often oppose it in the case of the deceased’s parents. In addition, supporters of PAR usually rely on an individualistic version of liberalism, thus focusing on a personal rather than relational approach to autonomy. This article proposes an alternative and comprehensive theoretical framework for the practice of PAR, based on the concepts of solidarity and relational autonomy. By analyzing empirical data on people’s attitudes towards PAR, we reveal an important distinction between the deceased’s wish and the deceased’s consent. In addition, we show that in the majority of cases individuals report that the well-being of their relatives is paramount once they are dead. This finding, as will be demonstrated in the article, is not fully in line with Tremellen and Savulescu’s position who allow PAR in the case of the deceased’s spouse but not in the case of his parents. We also suggest that a relational autonomy perspective can be used to evaluate the choices and actions of the deceased, and to justify the requests for PAR by his spouse or parents. Furthermore, the discussion leads us to analyze both Sandel’s account of solidarity and the more recent account of Prainsack and Buyx. We conclude that PAR can be considered as a solidarity-based practice, both at the familial and societal level, an aspect that should be given more emphasis in the discourse surrounding PAR. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |