| Popis: |
Auxiliary data associated with the article "Constraints on Tidal Quality Factor in Kepler Eclipsing Binaries using Tidal Synchronization: A Frequency-Dependent Approach" by Patel, R., Penev, K. and Schussler J. The contents of the files are as follows: samples.zip Bayesian analysis samples constraining the tidal dissipation efficiency of individual binaries. The archive contains a separate HDF5 file for each binary named acconding to its Kepler Input Catalog identifier. The values of the sampled system and tidal dissipation parameters are stored as blobs (https://emcee.readthedocs.io/en/stable/user/blobs/) lgQ_period.zip AAS-journal style machine readable tables containing the 2.3%, 15.9%, 50.0%, 84.1%, and 97.7% quantiles of \(\log_{10}Q_\star'\) for each binary as a function of tidal period (Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 in the article) burnin_period.zip AAS-journal style machine readable tables containing the burn-in periods for the 2.3%, 15.9%, 84.1%, and 97.7% quantiles of \(\log_{10}Q_\star'\) for each binary as a function of tidal period (Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 in the article) cdfstd_period.zip AAS-journal style machine readable tables containing the uncertainty in the fraction of the \(\log_{10}Q_\star'\) distribution that lies below each of the 2.3%, 15.9%, 84.1%, and 97.7% quantiles as a function of tidal period (Fig. 5 and Fig. 6 in the article) combined_constraint_quantiles.mrt AAS-journal style machine readable table containing the 2.3%, 15.9%, 50.0%, 84.1%, and 97.7% quantiles of the combined constraint of \(\log_{10}Q_\star'\) as a function of tidal period (Fig. 7 in the article) individual_vs_combined_constraints.mrt AAS-journal style machine readable table containing the 2.3%, 15.9%, 50.0%, 84.1%, and 97.7% quantiles of the combined constraint of \(\log_{10}Q_\star'\) as a function of tidal period and the 2.3% and 97.7% quantiles of individual systems at the tidal periods where the difference between the latter is smallest (Fig. 8 in the article) |
