Creep Behavior of Shale: Nanoindentation vs. Triaxial Creep Tests
| Autor: | Bo Liu, F. S. Rassouli, Mehdi Ostadhassan, Kouqi Liu |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Materials science
0211 other engineering and technologies Modulus Geology 02 engineering and technology Nanoindentation 010502 geochemistry & geophysics Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology Triaxial shear test 01 natural sciences Amplitude Creep Phase (matter) Composite material Oil shale Differential stress 021101 geological & geomatics engineering 0105 earth and related environmental sciences Civil and Structural Engineering |
| Zdroj: | Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. 54:321-335 |
| ISSN: | 1434-453X 0723-2632 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00603-020-02255-4 |
| Popis: | In this study, three shale samples from the Wolfcamp Formation in Permian basin were selected and studied for creep behavior using two different methods at macro- and micro-scale: triaxial and nanoindentation creep tests. The triaxial creep test showed the effects of axial differential stress on the creep behavior of shale rocks including the strain and contact creep modulus. As the axial differential stress increased, the creep strain value presented an increasing trend. Additionally, based on the grid nanoindentation creep experiments, three different mechanical phases were recognized in these samples; Phase 1: soft mechanical phase, Phase 2: intermediate, and Phase 3: hard mechanical phase. Based on the micro-scale results, at the same creep time periods, phase 1 (clay + organic matter) was found to have a smaller contact creep modulus and larger creep strain value than Phase 3 (quartz). Comparing the results from these two scales of measurements, the contact creep modulus from the triaxial test and the homogenized contact creep modulus from nanoindentation experiments showed some discrepancies. Based on the samples in this study, the contact creep modulus from the triaxial test varied from 0.5 to 4 times the value of the nanoindentation test. The differences between the contact creep modulus from the nanoindentation and triaxial test could be due to the creep strain amplitude. Considering Sample 1 as an example, the creep strain amplitude under the nanoindentation is inferred to be 0.069 which is not equal to the creep strain amplitude from the triaxial test (0.0052 under differential stress of 30 MPa). Ultimately, the contact creep modulus from the nanoindentation can fluctuate based on the samples’ content, while the reason for this is still a question that needs further study. Overall, this study is a preliminary investigation to help us understand how nanomechanical data in complex geomaterials can relate to traditional triaxial data. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink