| Popis: |
Purchasing specifications for beef carcasses have been aimed at reducing carcass variability and elevating the visual and keeping qualities of retail cuts. But more recently, the Meat and Livestock Commission's blueprint for improved consistent quality beef has incorporated a number of post-mortem treatments aimed at improving tenderness. Do these treatments which include electrical stimulation, pelvic bone suspension, slow chilling and prolonged ageing, exert an influence on quality which masks the intrinsic variation due to the primary production factors of feed, age, sex and possibly breed, or are the production and post-mortem effects additive? To what extent are the post-mortem treatments themselves additive? |
