Round-robin analysis of the RILEM TC 162-TDF beam-bending test: Part 3—Fibre distribution
| Autor: | Lucie Vandewalle, B.I.G. Barr, D. Dupont, S. Schaerlaekens, Henrik Stang, B. Schnütgen, E. Erdem, Ernst Jan de Place Hansen, M. K. Lee |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2003 |
| Předmět: |
Toughness
Critical section Materials science business.industry Building and Construction Structural engineering Test method Fibre cement Mechanics of Materials Deflection (engineering) Solid mechanics General Materials Science Round robin test Boundary value problem Composite material business Civil and Structural Engineering |
| Zdroj: | Materials and Structures. 36:631-635 |
| ISSN: | 1871-6873 1359-5997 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/bf02483283 |
| Popis: | A round robin test programme was executed amongst several laboratories on the beam test recommended by the RILEM TC 162-TDF [1]. In the proposed test method, the mid-span deflection is to be measured on both sides of the beam (referred to as δ1 and δ2). A systematic fibre counting exercise was carried out on several beam specimens to investigate whether there is a correlation between differences between δ1 and δ2 and the fibre distribution. The findings of the investigation suggest that differences between δ1 and δ2 are not strongly linked with the fibre distribution regardless of concrete strength. It is likely that this phenomenon arises because the supports and loading points have enough degrees of freedom to accommodate any unevenness on the specimen surface. This reflects well on the robustness of the proposed test method as it means that the proposed boundary conditions are able to adapt and tolerate (to a certain degree) surface non-uniformity. However, it is also suggested that significant differences between δ1 and δ2 may be brought about by experimental errors. The fibre count also reveals that toughness increases with the number of fibres across the critical section. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink