| Popis: |
The judicial procedure for appealing of actions and decisions of public authorities is the most common way to protect violated rights. However, the implementation of this right does not always end with the adoption of a decision in favor of the subject of appeal, and they appeal to a higher court. In this case, the appeal procedure has its own peculiarities associated not only with the difference in procedural rules, but also with the difference in the court to which the examined complaint is sent. Therefore, consideration of the mechanism for the implementation of one of the main administrative rights of citizens, organizations, enterprises and institutions is relevant. In addition, the relevance of this research is due to the ongoing judicial reform, in accordance with which the system of appeal and cassation courts was created, thereby changing the procedure for appealing to a higher instance. The purpose of this study is a comprehensive analysis of the mechanism for appealing actions and decisions of agency of State administration. The objective of this study is to review the procedural rules that provide the basis and procedure for appealing actions and decisions of public authorities. In this study, we used a comparative legal and systematic method, a method of technical and legal analysis. |
