Developing diagnostic, evidence-based approaches to interrogation

Autor:	Dominick J Atkinson, Christian A. Meissner, Rachel E. Dianiska, Jessica K. Swanner
Rok vydání:	2016
Předmět:	Evidence-based practice Interview 05 social sciences Experimental and Cognitive Psychology Context (language use) Data science Clinical Psychology Credibility 050501 criminology Justice (ethics) Interrogation Psychology Social psychology Applied Psychology 0505 law
Zdroj:	Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 5:295-301
ISSN:	2211-369X 2211-3681
DOI:	10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.07.001
Popis:	While research on interrogation has traditionally focused on problematic practices that lead to false confessions, more recent research has addressed the need to develop scientifically validated techniques that lead to accurate information from both suspects and sources. In the present review, we summarize this recent research on building and maintaining rapport, eliciting information, presenting evidence, and assessing credibility. Research is described in the context of accusatorial (guilt-presumptive and psychologically manipulative) versus information-gathering (cooperative and evidence based) approaches to interviewing and interrogation. We also suggest future directions for research to continue to improve the efficacy of interviews and interrogations.
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::0edfd5b8710d7a58ce35a7854e0d1262 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.07.001 Zobrazit plný text záznamu Full Text from ScienceDirect