Quality of the patient-oriented information on thyroid cancer in the internet
Autor: | Viraj Udayanga, Sanjeewa Seneviratne, Umesh Jayarajah, Soraj D Colonne |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
business.industry 030503 health policy & services Health Policy media_common.quotation_subject Biomedical Engineering Information quality Usability medicine.disease Readability 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Medicine Quality (business) Medical physics 030212 general & internal medicine LIDA 0305 other medical science business Thyroid cancer Reliability (statistics) Patient education media_common |
Zdroj: | Health Policy and Technology. 9:302-307 |
ISSN: | 2211-8837 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.03.007 |
Popis: | Objectives This study was conducted to analyse the readability and quality of patient education websites about thyroid cancer. Methods Yahoo!, Google and Bing were searched with their default settings using the keywords thyroid cancer, thyroid tumour, thyroid tumor, and thyroid malignancy for relevant websites. The first 50 websites obtained for each keyword and search engine were evaluated using validated Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), LIDA and DISCERN scores to assess readability, usability and reliability, and quality of information. Statistical analysis were done using non-parametric tests. Results The analysis included 49 eligible websites selected out of 600 websites obtained from the search engines. Twenty-two (44.9%) web sites had obtained Health on the net foundation code of conduct (HON-code) certification. The included websites had a median FRES score of 55.3(range 25.3–85.3) and the LIDA reliability and usability scores were 22.0(range 14–30) and 39.0(range 28–50), respectively. The median DISCERN score was 48.0(range 33–63). A total DISCERN score of 50% or less (low score) was found in 28.5%(n = 14) of the websites. A significant association was found between LIDA usability and, reliability scores and DISCERN score (p Conclusion The quality of the websites, readability and usability scores were moderate or low based on the criteria used. Access to quality information may help with better informed decisions on treatment, follow up and prognosis. As the internet use by the public is ever increasing, implementing measures to ensure the quality information without a bias should be considered a priority. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |