| Popis: |
The fabrication of conformal cooling channels (CCC's) has become easier and more affordable due to recent developments in additive manufacturing. The use of CCC's allows better cooling performance than the conventional (straight drilled) channels, in the injection molding process. The main reason for this is that the CCC's can follow the paths of the molded geometry, whereas the conventional channels made by conventional machining techniques are not able to do so. CCCs can help to reduce thermal strains and warpage by reducing cycle time and allowing for a more uniform temperature distribution. CCC, on the other hand, has a more complicated design procedure than traditional channels. Computer-Aided Engineering (CAE) simulations) are crucial to achieve an effective and cost-efficient design. This article focuses the comparison of two ANSYS modules, for results validation. The relative error between ANSYS Workbench and ANSYS Mechanical APDL varied from close to 0 to below 1 %, in the case of maximum temperature Tmax, and between 1.5 to 5.5 approximately, for the average temperature Tavg. It can be concluded that, for the most refined mesh studied, the results are close by the two modules. Therefore, the ANSYS module to work on should be used based on the purpose of the work, as well as the complexity of the CAD geometry. |
