| Autor: |
Hélène Eltchaninoff, Remi Houel, Sébastien Armero, Alain Tavildari, Sylvain Beurtheret, Sabrina Siame, Nicolas Barra, P Leprince, Mathieu Pankert, Nicole Karam, Noémie Resseguier, Marc Laskar, H. Le Breton, O. Com, Jean-Philippe Verhoye, Philippe Commeau, Richard Gelisse, Julien Seitz, Martine Gilard, P. Khanoyan |
| Rok vydání: |
2019 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements. 11:71 |
| ISSN: |
1878-6480 |
| DOI: |
10.1016/j.acvdsp.2018.10.155 |
| Popis: |
Background Femoral access is currently the preferred approach for TAVI procedures. However, it is not feasible in all cases and alternative access sites, peripheral and transthoracic have emerged. Purpose To compare femoral to non-femoral peripheral vascular access site in propensity matched group. Methods Using data from the national prospective French registry in France – the France TAVI registry – we compared the characteristics and outcomes of TAVI procedures according to whether they were performed through a femoral or a non-femoral peripheral (transcarotid or transaxillary), with a propensity score-based matching of patients with femoral and non-femoral peripheral interventions. Results Among 13.157 patients included in the France TAVI registry, 83.9% underwent a femoral TAVI, 6.7% a non-femoral peripheral vascular TAVI, and 9.4% transthoracic TAVI. Patients in non-femoral peripheral access were more severe (mean logistic Euroscore 17.3 vs. 19.7, P Conclusion Compared to femoral approach, non-femoral peripheral TAVI is associated with a similar outcome except for a twice-lower rate to access site-related complications. It should be considered more routinely as an alternative to femoral approach. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect