Extraterrestrial, terrestrial and laboratory diamonds — Differences and similarities
Autor: | Petr Louda, A. Karczemska, Marian Szurgot, Victor Ralchenko, Stanislaw Mitura, Malgorzata I. Szynkowska, V.V. Danilenko, Marcin Kozanecki |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2008 |
Předmět: |
Materials science
Synthetic diamond Mechanical Engineering Material properties of diamond Primitive achondrite Lonsdaleite Mineralogy General Chemistry Ureilite Iron meteorite Electronic Optical and Magnetic Materials law.invention Astrobiology Meteorite law Materials Chemistry Electrical and Electronic Engineering Nanodiamond |
Zdroj: | Diamond and Related Materials. 17:1179-1185 |
ISSN: | 0925-9635 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.diamond.2008.02.021 |
Popis: | Characterization tools such as confocal Raman micro-spectroscopy, Laser Ablation (LA-ICP-TOF-MS) and SEM-EDS were used to characterize meteorites: primitive achondrite — not classified NWA XXX ureilite found in 2006 in Morocco and the graphite nodula from the Canyon Diablo iron meteorite. The presence of diamond was confirmed in both samples. There are two kinds of meteoritic diamonds: diamonds of the sizes of microns up to millimeters are most probably of impact origin, nanodiamonds of the sizes of 1–3 nm, called presolar diamonds because of the isotopic anomalies, are believed to be formed before our Solar System was formed. There are many theories concerning presolar diamonds formation, among them: impact shock metamorphism driven by supernovae or chemical vapor deposition (CVD) from stellar outflows. We examined the properties of diamond nanopowders obtained by the PA CVD and detonation methods. Nanodiamonds obtained by the detonation method, called ultradispersed detonation diamonds (UDD), are of the same range of sizes as presolar diamonds. The results show both differences and similarities among meteoritic, terrestrial and laboratory diamonds. The comparison will help to understand the processes during presolar nanodiamonds formation. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |