What Do Online Complainers Want? An Examination of the Justice Motivations and the Moral Implications of Vigilante and Reparation Schemas

Autor: Yany Grégoire, Thomas M. Tripp, Marie-Louise Radanielina-Hita, Jeff Joireman, Renaud Legoux, Jeff D. Rotman
Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
Zdroj: Journal of Business Ethics. 160:167-188
ISSN: 1573-0697
0167-4544
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-018-3850-1
Popis: This research aims to understand how two basic schemas—vigilante and reparation—influence online public complaining. Drawing on two experiments, a longitudinal field study and content analysis of online complaints, the current research makes three core contributions. First, we show that for similar service failures, each schema is associated with different justice motivations (i.e., in terms of recovery, revenge, and protection of others), which have different moral implications for consumers. Second, vigilante and reparation complainers write complaints in a different manner and are drawn to different online platforms; this information is helpful to identify complainers using each schema. Third, the schemas moderate the process leading to different post-complaint benefits (i.e., resolution and positive affect). Specifically, perseverance has a greater effect on obtaining a resolution for reparation complainers compared to vigilantes. Additionally, whereas a recovery leads to an increase in positive affect for reparation complainers, vigilantes experience a high level of positive affect simply by posting their complaint (regardless of the resolution). The theoretical, ethical, and managerial implications of these findings are discussed.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: