| Popis: |
Dados do CENIPA (Centro de Investigacao e Prevencao de Acidentes Aeronauticos) mostram que o processo decisorio da tripulacao de voo foi responsavel por 2,57% dos acidentes ocorridos entre 2004 e 2014. O fator ‘julgamento de pilotagem foi responsavel por 13,23% e as condicoes meteorologicas adversas, 3,37%. Nesse contexto, o presente artigo procura demonstrar como os avancos tecnologicos contribuiram no julgamento e no processo de decisao dos pilotos em condicoes meteorologicas adversas e a consequencia de todos esses fatores na seguranca de voo. A metodologia utilizada para tal fim se da por meio de pesquisa bibliografica e documental que demonstra os avancos na area de seguranca de voo oriundos dos estudos de fatores humanos, das condicoes adversas de tempo e dos avancos tecnologicos e os efeitos destes nas tecnologias de radares meteorologicos embarcados, na tomada de decisao em condicoes meteorologicas adversas. Demonstrara que, com a tecnologia na aviacao, tornou-se possivel que as tripulacoes obtenham maior previsibilidade das suas rotas, tornando possivel a antecipacao do planejamento para tomar decisoes em condicoes meteorologicas adversas. Normal 0 false false false PT-BR X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Tabela normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0in; mso-para-margin-right:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0in; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-ansi-language:PT-BR;} A B S T R A C T CENIPA data shows that ";decision-making process"; in flight were responsible for 2.57% of accidents from 2004 to 2014. The ";pilot judgment"; factor caused 13.23% of acidentes and bad weather conditions caused 3.37%. Therefore, this article seeks to show how technological advances have contributed in the trial and pilot’s decision in bad weather conditions and what was the contribution of all these points in flight safety. The method used were the literature and the documental research demonstrating advances in the area of flight safety arising from human factors studies, bad weather conditions and technological advances, and the effects of advances in weather radar embedded technologies in decision making on weather adverse. With automation in aviation it became possible that crew members obtain greater predictability of their routes, making it possible to advance planning to take decisions in bad weather conditions. Keywords: Flight safety. Decision making. Adverse weather. Human factors. Technological advances in aviation. |
