Unusually high thermospheric hydrogen density prior to severe storm of September 8, 2017 and its impact on the storm manifestations

Autor: Yakiv Chepurnyy, Philip G. Richards, Manuel Hernández-Pajares, Fuminori Tsuchiya, Masafumi Shoji, Vladimir Truhlik, Ayako Matsuoka, Dmytro Kotov, Yoshiya Kasahara, I. F. Domnin, Iku Shinohara, T. G. Zhivolup, Mariangel Fedrizzi, Atsushi Kumamoto, Yoshizumi Miyoshi, Naomi Maruyama, Leonid Emelyanov, Maryna Shulha, János Lichtenberger, Oleksandr Bogomaz
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
DOI: 10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-6925
Popis: Atomic hydrogen plays a key role for the plasmasphere, exosphere, and the nighttime ionosphere. It directly impacts the rate of plasmasphere refilling after strong magnetic storms as atomic hydrogen is the primary source of hydrogen ions. It is the source of the geocorona, which significantly affects ring current decay during the recovery phase of magnetic storms.Our previous studies with the Kharkiv incoherent scatter radar (49.6 N, 36.3 E), Arase and DMSP satellite missions, and FLIP physical model showed that during magnetically quiet periods of 2016–2018 the hydrogen density was generally a factor of 2 higher than from the NRLMSIS00-E model (Kotov et al., 2018).Even larger values of thermospheric hydrogen density were detected prior to the severe storm of September 8, 2017. With Kharkiv IS radar, AWDANet whistler receivers, Arase satellite, and TEC data we found that during the nights of September 5 to 6 and September 6 to 7, the thermospheric hydrogen density had to be at least a factor of 4 higher than the values from NRLMSIS00-E model i.e. ~100% higher than expected from our previous studies. We discuss the possible mechanisms that could lead to the increased hydrogen density.Such high hydrogen densities may be the reason for very quick recovery of inner plasmasphere after the severe depletion by the storm of September 8, 2017 (Obana et al., 2019).References:1. Kotov, D. V., Richards, P. G., Truhlík, V., Bogomaz, O. V., Shulha, M. O., Maruyama, N., et al. ( 2018). Coincident observations by the Kharkiv IS radar and ionosonde, DMSP and Arase (ERG) satellites, and FLIP model simulations: Implications for the NRLMSISE‐00 hydrogen density, plasmasphere, and ionosphere. Geophysical Research Letters, 45, 8062– 8071. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL0792062. Obana, Y., Maruyama, N., Shinbori, A., Hashimoto, K. K., Fedrizzi, M., Nosé, M., et al. (2019). Response of the ionosphere‐plasmasphere coupling to the September 2017 storm: What erodes the plasmasphere so severely? Space Weather, 17, 861–876. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019SW002168
Databáze: OpenAIRE