Analysis of beneficial management practices to mitigate environmental impacts in dairy production systems around the Great Lakes
| Autor: | William Salas, R. Cesar Izaurralde, Larry Chase, Nick Stoddart, Curtis D. Jones, Daesoo Kim, Olivier Jolliet, Rebecca A. Larson, Gregory J. Thoma, Matthew D. Ruark, Karin Veltman, Joyce Cooper, Pete Ingraham, C. Alan Rotz, Richard Gaillard, Horacio A. Aguirre-Villegas |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Manure management
010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences 04 agricultural and veterinary sciences 01 natural sciences Biogas Environmental protection Greenhouse gas 040103 agronomy & agriculture Small farm Carbon footprint 0401 agriculture forestry and fisheries Environmental science Animal Science and Zoology Environmental impact assessment Agronomy and Crop Science Life-cycle assessment Water use 0105 earth and related environmental sciences |
| Zdroj: | Agricultural Systems. 176:102660 |
| ISSN: | 0308-521X |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102660 |
| Popis: | The influence of farm-specific beneficial management practices (BMPs) on a set of comprehensive environmental impacts was characterized and quantified for two representative dairy farms in the Great Lakes region (a large 1500-cow farm in New York (NY) and a smaller 150-cow farm in Wisconsin (WI)). Comparative benefits or drawbacks of the effect of the adoption of selected management scenarios to environmental impacts were estimated by coupling the output from the Integrated Farm System Model (IFSM) to provide lifecycle inventory data for SimaPro©. The small dairy farm in WI generated a consistently larger carbon footprint than the large dairy farm in NY due to greater enteric methane (CH4) emissions from different feeds fed and greater nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from the bedded pack housing facility for young stock. The flare scenario of burning biogas produced in a covered manure storage on the small farm and a whole-farm mitigation plan of combined feed, field, and manure management in the large farm demonstrate significant potential to reduce overall carbon footprint by 20.0% and 25.8%, respectively, compared to the baselines. The assessments of selective impact categories such as fossil energy use, water use, land occupation, aquatic eutrophication, terrestrial acidification, respiratory effects, human toxicity, and ecotoxicity are discussed and highlight hot spots relevant for sustainable dairy farm management. Normalization analysis indicates that eutrophication potential is the largest relative impact profile, which suggests that efforts to mitigate eutrophication can achieve relatively greater environmental impact reduction. Although this study identifies the beneficial adaptation of sustainable dairy production practices on individual impact profiles, trade-offs between impact categories make the analysis more complex when considering the comprehensive suite of environmental impacts. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect