Inter-rater variability of visual interpretation and comparison with quantitative evaluation of 11C-PiB PET amyloid images of the Japanese Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (J-ADNI) multicenter study
Autor: | Michio Senda, Kengo Ito, Kenji Ishii, Tomohiko Yamane, Kazunari Ishii, Yasuhiko Ikari, Muneyuki Sakata, Takashi Kato, Tomoyuki Nishio |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2016 |
Předmět: |
Pathology
medicine.medical_specialty medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Cognition Standardized uptake value General Medicine Audiology medicine.disease 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging 03 medical and health sciences Inter-rater reliability 0302 clinical medicine Neuroimaging Positron emission tomography Cerebellar cortex medicine Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Alzheimer's disease business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative |
Zdroj: | European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 44:850-857 |
ISSN: | 1619-7089 1619-7070 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00259-016-3591-2 |
Popis: | The aim of this study was to assess the inter-rater variability of the visual interpretation of 11C-PiB PET images regarding the positivity/negativity of amyloid deposition that were obtained in a multicenter clinical research project, Japanese Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (J-ADNI). The results of visual interpretation were also compared with a semi-automatic quantitative analysis using mean cortical standardized uptake value ratio to the cerebellar cortex (mcSUVR). A total of 162 11C-PiB PET scans, including 45 mild Alzheimer’s disease, 60 mild cognitive impairment, and 57 normal cognitive control cases that had been acquired as J-ADNI baseline scans were analyzed. Based on visual interpretation by three independent raters followed by consensus read, each case was classified into positive, equivocal, and negative deposition (ternary criteria) and further dichotomized by merging the former two (binary criteria). Complete agreement of visual interpretation by the three raters was observed for 91.3% of the cases (Cohen κ = 0.88 on average) in ternary criteria and for 92.3% (κ = 0.89) in binary criteria. Cases that were interpreted as visually positive in the consensus read showed significantly higher mcSUVR than those visually negative (2.21 ± 0.37 vs. 1.27 ± 0.09, p |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |