Concepts of Theatricality in Contemporary Art History
Autor: | Michael L. Quinn |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 1995 |
Předmět: | |
Zdroj: | Theatre Research International. 20:106-113 |
ISSN: | 1474-0672 0307-8833 |
Popis: | Theatre historians often turn to art history, not only for information about source images that can help with the speculative reconstruction of lost performances, but also for lessons in historiographic method. Historians from both disciplines have long shared the difficulties of ‘ekphrasis’, i.e. the translation of nondiscursive images into descriptions, and vice versa, as well as other vexing problems of general history like periodization, documentation of events, and so on. Unlike theatre history, art history has a recognized pantheon of interpreters, which has been subjected to overview studies like Michael Podro'sThe Critical Historians of Artas well as specific treatments of major critics and their influence, like Michael Ann Holly's work on Panofsky. Theoretical concerns about historiography, sometimes assumed by literary critics of ‘master narratives’ to be synonymous with postmodernism, developed somewhat earlier in art historical writing, which would appear to be an advantage. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |