Comparison of Self-Report Data Validity in Undergraduate Samples Using Remote Versus In-Person Administration Methods

Autor: Sharpe, Brinkley, Rose, Leigha, Phillips, Nathaniel, Lynam, Donald, Miller, Josh
Rok vydání: 2022
Předmět:
DOI: 10.17605/osf.io/4m8cg
Popis: The purpose of the present study is to test whether administration approach (remote vs. in person) yields meaningful differences in data validity of self-report surveys. Specifically, we will randomly assign participants to complete questionnaires in a typical laboratory administration setting (i.e., groups of 4-8; 1-2 research assistants present to monitor) versus remotely in a location of their choosing. Data from both conditions will be examined using multiple data validation strategies discussed previously (Sharpe et al., in press).
Databáze: OpenAIRE