Fitness Test Equipment Postnatal Digital Observation and Equipment for Determining the Conventional Monitoring Of Stage IV Women
| Autor: | Firman F. Wirakusumah, Yona Septina, Achmad Suardi |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1477:062008 |
| ISSN: | 1742-6596 1742-6588 |
| DOI: | 10.1088/1742-6596/1477/6/062008 |
| Popis: | The IV stage of labor is the time after the birth of the placenta until 2 hours thereafter, these two hours are used to monitor the mother, which consists of the first hour of examination done every 15 minutes once, and at the second hour, the examination is done every 30 minutes. The intensive examination is very necessary at this time because this period is a transition period that must be observed properly with a sufficient number of checks so that a tool that has high accuracy and practicality is also very much needed. This study aims to test the suitability of digital postpartum observation devices with conventional tools in determining the results of the IV stage of monitoring. The research design is an analytic study with design cross-sectional. The sample of the study was 53 people who met the inclusion criteria in the Lumbung Health Center (PUSKESMAS) in Ciamis District using a consecutive sampling technique. Retrieval of data on the results of stage IV monitoring in mothers using two tools, namely using digital post-natal observation with conventional tools. Analysis using the conformity Test “Cohen’s Kappa”. The results of measurements using a digital post-natal observation tool have different levels of conformity with measurements using conventional tools, including blood pressure measurement has conformity value systole of (0.545) and diastole of (0.554) with a category sufficient (Moderate), pulse measurements have a corresponding value (0.573) with sufficient category (moderate), temperature measurement has conformity value (0.961) with Very Strong category (Very Good), contraction measurement has conformity value (0.731) with strong category (good). Only one measurement has a level of compliance with the category of very good (very good), so this tool still needs improvement, so the authors do not recommend the tool to be used before any repairs. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|