| Popis: |
Industrial and Organizational Psychology is one of the sub science of Psychology and it researches human behavior at work life. Both studying the researchers at domain of Industrial and organizational psychology and at the other disciplines the researchers try to put forth objective information in keeping with scientific principles. The scholars would like to access objective knowledge with scientific researches but when the research is being done ethical issues either ignored or neglected by researchers. The scholars whatever discipline it is their studies who conform ethical principal of scientific research, this situation could be the direct effect on objectivity and correctness of research results. But in recent years it is often encountered ethical violation, fabrication, falsifation, duplicate publication and plagiarism in researches. The aim of this research is to determine whether getting ethical permission and ethical violation on researches field of industrial and organizational psychology. Job satisfaction and organizational commitment are positive worker behaviors and job stress and mobbing or workplace bullying are negative worker behaviors.These are one of the main research topics of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. In this research of purpose is analysis ethical principals on researches field of industrial psychology that was done on positive and negative worker behaviors by researchers both in Turkey and the other countries. With this aim it was applied document analysis total to 232 manuscripts in three databases which are to ULAKBIM, Web of Science (WoS) and EBSCO Host databeses by researcher through library of Akdeniz University web site. The positive and negative worker behaviors were entered as keywords to data bases between 2010-2017 years by researcher and were selected 232 researches with proper sampling. Finally it was accessed the researches and it was tried determining whether applied ethical procedure by researchers of them. According to results; it was been determined to got ethical approval at 17 studies conversely it was determined not to be ethical approval at 55 studies all of them 72 studies in ULAKBIM database. On the other hand from 80 researches in WoS database it was determined got ethical approval at 37 studies but it was determined not to be ethical approval at 43 studies. And finally from 80 studies in EBSCO Host database, it was determined to got ethical approval at 38 studies conversely it was determined not to be ethical approval at 42 researches. It was tried to explain detail the other result of the researches in this research. |
