Čemu još istorija arheologije?
| Autor: | Babić, Staša |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2016 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Etnoantropološki Problemi, Vol 6, Iss 3 (2016) Etnoantropološki problemi |
| ISSN: | 2334-8801 0353-1589 |
| Popis: | Poslednjih decenija, u okviru širih kritičkih preispitivanja osnova arheologije, posebno u literaturi na engleskom jeziku, objavljen je niz radova koji ukazuju na genezu i teorijski okvir u kojem su nastali pojedini ključni koncepti unutar discipline. Sama osnova arheologije tako je smeštena u kulturni, politički i ideološki kontekst zapadne Evrope kraja XVIII i početka XIX veka. Na drugoj strani, ova strategija izučavanja prošlosti krajem XIX veka postala je deo akademskog života i u drugim sredinama (na primer, u Srbiji), gde su okolnosti bile sasvim drugačije. Pa ipak, osnovni koncepti preneti iz svog originalnog konteksta, nužno su pretrpeli transformacije i potom primenjivani sa dugotrajnim posledicama. Stoga je istraživanje istorije arheologije u različitim lokalnim sredinama značajno ne samo za same te sredine, već i za razumevanje društvene uloge i značaja arheološkog istraživanja uopšte. Over the last decades, in the framework of the wider critical reassessments of archaeological theory and practice, especially in the English-speaking literature, a number of writings have been published, pointing to the origins and theoretical background in which some of the basic concepts of the discipline were developed. The very essence of archaeology has thus been situated into the cultural, political and ideological context of Western Europe at the end of the 18th and beginning of the 19th century. On the other hand, by the end of the 19th century this strategy of study into the past has become a part of the academic life in other contexts (such as Serbia), where the general circumstances were utterly different. However, the basic concepts were transferred from their original setting, inevitably undergone transformations, and then applied with long-lasting consequences. Therefore, the importance of the study of the history of archaeology in various local settings surpasses local concerns, but contributes to deeper understanding of the social role and importance of archaeological research in general. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|