| Autor: |
Hansen, Mette Weinreich, Hansen, Stine Rosenlund |
| Přispěvatelé: |
Bonacho, Ricardo, Pinheiro de Sousa, Alcinda, Viegas, Cláudia, Martins, João Paulo, Pires, Maria José, Estêvão, Sara Velez |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2018 |
| Zdroj: |
Hansen, M W & Hansen, S R 2018, Integrated Food studies education and research : Challenges and potentials for integration and reflection . in R Bonacho, A Pinheiro de Sousa, C Viegas, J P Martins, M J Pires & S V Estêvão (eds), Experiencing Food, Designing Dialogues : Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Food Design and Food Studies (EFOOD 2017), Lisbon, Portugal, 19-21 October 2017 . 1 edn, CRC Press, London, Experiencing Food, Designing Dialogues., Lisbon, Portugal, 19/10/2017 . https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351271967 |
| DOI: |
10.1201/9781351271967 |
| Popis: |
The research group Foodscapes Innovation and Networks has addressed integrated food studies issues in re-search and education since 2010. Based on experiences in the group, this paper aims at discussing the chal-lenges, learning outcomes and potentials for pushing an integrated thinking into research and education. It also addresses the challenges in integration when the methodological approaches and theoretical frameworks chosen are ontologically and epistemologically different. A discussion of the limitations of integration is thus also part of the paper.The conceptual framework of ontonorms (Mol, 2013) is suggested as a common point of departure for a further development of integration. This is suggested relevant due to the fact that it forces different traditions to reflect their own value-related basis and discuss implications of this approach in a broader sense. The common values have been identified to be sustainability, healthy and better food, food systems change and enhanced food experiences. An approach that qualifies the discussions of ontological differences is suggested by Mol (2013) with the term ontonorms emphasizing that all ontological assumptions are embedded in scientific norms (what is good or bad science) and traditions (how do we see the world) rather than being based in the essentialist static and objective worldview of ontology in singular. Thus, what is considered ‘good’ and ‘proper’ obviously differs within different disciplines, but is often based on implicit normativities that can make it difficult to address the differences openly and constructively. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
