Retention and processing methods of nasal prosthesis
Autor: | marcelo Coelho goiato, Mancuso, Daniela Nardi, Zuccolotti, Bruna Carolina Rossati, Murakawa, Ana Cristina, Lima, Daniela Coelho, Santos, Daniela Micheline Dos, Andreotti, Agda Marobo |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Queen Mary University of London, Faculty of Alfenas |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2012 |
Předmět: |
medical literature
implant maxillofacial prosthesis nose prosthesis Nasal Surgical Procedures Nose face malformation Prosthesis Design Craniofacial Abnormalities Prosthesis Implantation adhesive agent pigment Adhesives Cosmetic Humans human Reconstructive Surgical Procedures Resin bibliographic database Medline Nasal prostheses laser Prosthesis Failure Resins Synthetic silicone Computer-Aided Design |
Zdroj: | Scopus Repositório Institucional da UNESP Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" |
Popis: | Submitted by Vitor Silverio Rodrigues (vitorsrodrigues@reitoria.unesp.br) on 2014-05-27T11:27:08Z No. of bitstreams: 0 Made available in DSpace on 2014-05-27T11:27:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2012-11-01 Patients with congenital malformations, traumatic or pathological mutilation and maxillofacial developmental disorders can be restored aesthetically and emotionally by the production and use of facial prostheses. The aim of this study was to review the literature about the retention and processing methods of facial prostheses, and discuss their characteristics. A literature review on Medline (PubMed) database was performed by using the keywords maxillofacial prosthesis, silicone, resin, pigment, cosmetic, prosthetic nose, based on articles published from 1956 to 2010. Several methods of retention, from adhesives to the placement of implants, and different processing methods such as laser, CAD/CAM and rapid prototyping technologies have been reported. There are advantages and disadvantages of each procedure, and none can be classified as better compared to others. Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School University of the State of São Paulo Department of Medicine and Dentistry Queen Mary University of London Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Faculty of Alfenas, Minas Gerais |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |