The internal struggles of the appetite: a secret teleology?

Autor: Raphaële Andrault
Přispěvatelé: Institut d’Histoire des Représentations et des Idées dans les Modernités (IHRIM), École normale supérieure de Lyon (ENS de Lyon)-Université Lumière - Lyon 2 (UL2)-Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 (UJML), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Université Blaise Pascal - Clermont-Ferrand 2 (UBP)-Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne (UJM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Clermont Auvergne (UCA), Adelino Cardoso et Marta Mendonça, Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 (UJML), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Université Lumière - Lyon 2 (UL2)-Université Jean Monnet [Saint-Étienne] (UJM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Blaise Pascal - Clermont-Ferrand 2 (UBP)-École normale supérieure - Lyon (ENS Lyon)-Université Clermont Auvergne [2017-2020] (UCA [2017-2020])
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2022
Předmět:
Zdroj: Leibniz-Stahl. Controvérsia sobre vida, organismo et teleologia
Adelino Cardoso et Marta Mendonça. Leibniz-Stahl. Controvérsia sobre vida, organismo et teleologia, Humus, p. 25-40, 2022, 978-989-755-702-6
HAL
Popis: International audience; This chapter examines the analogy between military tactics and the goal-directed functioning of appetites that Leibniz used both in the Discourse on Metaphysics (1686) and in his controversy with Stahl (1710). In so doing, my purpose is threefold: 1/ to question the unity of the concept of appetite in Leibniz; 2/ to show that Leibniz’s notion of the explanatory role of appetites casts doubt on the traditional conflation between appetite and desire for self-pres- ervation; 3/ to demonstrate that self-conscious appetites cannot be regarded as specific final causes of psychophysiological phenomena.; Este capítulo examina a analogia entre táctica militar e funciomento teleologicamente orientado dos apetites, que Leibniz utiliza no Discurso de Metafísica (1686), e na controvérsia com Stahl (1710). Ao proceder assim, o meu intento é triplo: 1) questionar a unidade do conceito de apetite em Leibniz, 2) mostrar que a noção de papel explicativo dos apetites em Leibniz lança dúvidas sobre a tradicional fusão entre apetite e desejo de autopreservação; 3) mostrar que os apetites conscientes não podem ser vistos como causas finais específicas de fenómenos psicofisiológicos.
Databáze: OpenAIRE