Why Is Co-management of Parks Not Working in Johannesburg?: The Difficult Reframing of State Mandate and Practices in the Post-Apartheid Era
| Autor: | Claire Bénit-Gbaffou |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Center for Urbanism and the Built Environment Studies, University of the Witwatersrand (CUBES), University of the Witwatersrand [Johannesburg] (WITS) |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
espaces verts urbains
gouvernance urbaine [SHS.ARCHI]Humanities and Social Sciences/Architecture space management urban policies lcsh:Political science [SHS.GEO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Geography urban development lcsh:HD72-88 [SHS.SCIPO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Political science policy implementation lcsh:Economic growth development planning instruments politiques governance Espaces publics urbains Communs urbains Johannesburg participation locale lcsh:J co-production des services urbains |
| Zdroj: | International Development Policy | Revue internationale de politique de développement International Development Policy | Revue internationale de politique de développement, Institut de hautes études internationales et du développement (IHEID), 2018, African cities and the development conundrum, 10 | 2018 (10), pp.101-136. ⟨10.4000/poldev.2659⟩ Revue Internationale de Politique de Développement, Vol 10, Pp 101-136 (2018) |
| ISSN: | 1663-9391 |
| DOI: | 10.4000/poldev.2659⟩ |
| Popis: | Johannesburg City Parks and Zoo (JCPZ) has affirmed its strong redistributive objective in post-apartheid Johannesburg, with the rapid development of new urban parks in former black townships. However, its operational budgets have remained limited in the face of the many pressing housing and infrastructural needs. Many park users, especially in formerly white (and still middle-class) suburbs, have resorted to forms of neighbourhood or community management to compensate for JCPZ’s absence. JCPZ is attempting to rebuild its mandate with regards to these public spaces, developing various policy instruments in response to the involvement of park users in the management of urban parks, but also to formalise that involvement. This chapter traces the genealogy of these policy instruments in the making, caught between multiple logics where neo-liberal pressures and models, regular engagements with park users marked by contested legitimacies and racial tensions, and the broader municipal redistributive agenda shape the way in which the post-apartheid state redefines its mandate. The chapter argues that the specific social and racial configurations in which these partnerships are framed on the ground are used by municipal officials to resist transforming their own practices towards more participatory and democratic processes of co-production of parks. The chapter reflects on shifting state mandates in urban governance in contemporary cities of the South and analyses policy instruments crafted for the complex task of formalising and regulating state–society co-production of urban services in the field of park management. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|