(In)compatibility of Special Expropriation Procedural Provisions with General Administrative Procedure Act

Autor: Danijela Romić, Božidar Horvat, Željka Vajda Halak
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2017
Předmět:
Zdroj: Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Splitu, Vol 54, Iss 4, Pp 903-920 (2017)
Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu
Volume 54
Issue 4
ISSN: 1847-0459
0584-9063
Popis: Načelo dosljednosti i legitimnih očekivanja građana predstavlja okosnicu za postupanje upravnih tijela bilo koje nacionalne ili nadnacionalne razine. Smisao ovoga načela je da upravna tijela, primjenjujući uobičajenu i javno objavljenu proceduru, prema građanima postupaju na uvijek jednak način. Ujednačenim i sustavnim postupanjem jamče se pravna sigurnost, izvjesnost i zaštita legitimnih očekivanja građana. Republika Hrvatska je 2009. g. donijela potpuno novi postupovni zakon upravo s namjerom da se njime osigura primjena navedenih načela. No, pravo je pitanje koliko se u praksi, u postupcima donošenja zakona (nakon donošenja novog ZUP-a), odredbe istih usklađuju s općim postupovnim propisom. U radu se analiziraju postupovne odredbe Zakona o izvlaštenju i određivanju naknade (donesen 2014. g.), te se ukazuje na nepotrebno velik broj postupovnih odredbi koje često nisu u skladu sa ZUP-om ili su potpuno suprotne njemu.
The principle of consistency and principle of legitimate expectations of citizens are the basis for the treatment of administrative bodies of any national or supranational level. The purpose of this principle is that the administrative bodies, by applying the usual and publicly announced procedure, treat citizens in the same way. Harmonized and systematic procedures guarantee the legal security, certainty and protection of legitimate expectations of citizens. The Republic of Croatia adopted in 2009 a completely new procedural act precisely with the intent to ensure the application of these principles. However, the question is how far the provisions are in line with the general procedural regulation in the law-making process (following the adoption of a new General Administrative procedure Act). This paper analyse the procedural provisions of the Expropriation and Determining of Compensation Act (passed in 2014), and points to the unnecessary number of procedural provisions that are often incompatible with, or they are completely contrary to the General Administrative procedure Act.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: