Exempla docent. How to Make Sense of Aristotle’s Examples of the Fallacy of Accident (Doxography Matters)

Autor:	Gazziero, Leone
Přispěvatelé:	Savoirs, Textes, Langage (STL) - UMR 8163 (STL), Université de Lille-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Jazyk:	angličtina
Rok vydání:	2015
Předmět:	paralogismes du conséquents commentateurs byzantins Aristotle commentateurs latins Sophistici elenchi paralogismes de l’accident [SHS.PHIL]Humanities and Social Sciences/Philosophy fallacy of accident Aristote Réfutations sophistiques Latin Commentators fallacy of consequent Byzantin Commentators
Zdroj:	Acta philosophica Acta philosophica, 2015
ISSN:	1121-2179
Popis:	International audience; Scholarly dissatisfaction with Aristotle’s fallacy of accident has traditionally focused on his examples, whose compatibility with the fallacy’s definition has been doubted time and again. Besides a unified account of the fallacy of accident itself, the paper provides a formalized analysis of its several examples in Aristotle’s Sophistici elenchi. The most problematic instances are dealt with by means of an internal reconstruction of their features as conveyed by Aristotle’s text and an extensive survey of their interpretation in the Byzantine and Latin exegetical tradition. Carefully handled a doxographical approach, as opposed to rapid results oriented practices, proves to be most effective in that it supplies both useful albeit ordinarily overlooked insights and a comprehensive framework of reference for further investigations.
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=dedup_wf_001::a9e2ca7acc6c3653c15fd0a827580e87 https://hal.science/hal-01254531 Zobrazit plný text záznamu